'My faith has nothing to fear from my scholarship', de Vaux once stated to Edmund Wilson. No doubt it didn't, but that was never in fact the real question. The real question was whether his scholarship, and its reliability, had anything to fear from his faith.
OK, so I purposefully left out the origin and author of that quote up there. Why would I do that? Well, I didn't want anyone to be prejudiced by the title of the book or the author when he/she reads it. Just read it. What does it mean to you? Do you agree? Do you disagree? If you found out that someone you liked and agreed with wrote it, would you like it more? If not, would you like it less? And why?
Take this example, for instance. Should I get mad at my husband if I ask him how a certain dress looks on me, and he says that it looks really bad? It does matter how he says it, and the condition of our relationship, but let's say we have a pretty good relationship. Some people would get mad regardless, so their husband would have to lie in order to keep the "peace". Maybe some people want to live like that, not knowing what other people are REALLY thinking. Maybe they would rather want to hear pleasant lies, but I don't. I do think there are better and worse ways of dealing with situations where sensitivity may be involved. But good or bad, the truth is more important. What if you and your husband have opened up good lines of communication with each other over the years and when he says, "No, that dress looks awful on you." You laugh and say, "I think I'll get rid of it." Or, what if he knows that you are sensitive about it, so he clarifies and says, "Hun, you are so beautiful, but that dress is not a good style for you. That one that is [color] and [style] looks really good on you." Or, if someone is really just a big jerk, and is trying to be mean, wouldn't you rather know it, than be constantly living a big lie? We can build up good relationships with good people by being honest and loving. Who cares about the other ones?
Also, if I judge what someone says as being bad without acknowledging any truth that it may contain, then how are we ever going to progress? This is not very helpful, "It's black," "No, sir, it is white, you are stupid," "You're stupid, it's obviously black!" "I'm trying to be civil with you, it's white (what a moron)," "But can't you see it is black (pompous ass)."
But maybe some people prefer darkness, "And this is the judgment, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness, rather than light because their deeds were evil." (Jn 3:19)
Maybe someone wants to know where and from whom that quote up there came from? But if you do, just make sure you also ask yourself, "Why" and "What do I plan on doing with the information?" If you do want to know, I'll write it in the comments, but you have to say please.

Who reads this blog who would actually be prejudiced about the author? Or maybe just, who reads this blog???
ReplyDeleteI like your point though.
Well, iffin anyone ever did. . .
ReplyDeleteThe thing is, Halcyon8, I was reading a book and I liked that quote. It seemed to be a really good point to ponder. Do we feel as if we need to protect our belief systems, or are we honestly open to new ideas and the truth?
ReplyDeletePeople often subjectively judge a messenger, then discount whatever he/she is saying, rather than objectively looking for truth wherever it may be. Sometimes the truth can be hard to take, so we try to protect ourselves from having to feel that discomfort by calling the truth evil. However,there is no truth in Satan,
"He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him." Jn 8:44
Do I judge my fellow man to be Satan? Or, might there be some goodness and truth in anyone?
"For you love all things that exist, and you loath none of the things which you have made, for you would not have made anything if you had hated it. How would anything have endured if you had not willed it?" Wis 11:24
So, I guess what I was thinking is that I wanted to share and discuss that quote. But I would like to hear everyone's opinions, not just people who think that I'm on a certain "side". But how can I hear them if they won't speak them to me? How can we have a discussion if you won't enter my home and sit down with me because I am not "kosher". What is fitting(kasher) should be what you let into yourself according to the truth, and what is not fitting(kasher), is darkness and lies.
So, I can read a book, or listen to a person, and try to see what truth and goodness is in it/him/her and it doesn't mean that I am on a side, except the side of truth.
Why were you reading a book with a quote like THAT in it?!?
ReplyDeleteBecause I like to investigate conspiracy?
ReplyDeleteHere's another one for my theoretical audience Halcyon8,
ReplyDelete"Every good Christian ought to be more ready to give a favorable interpretation to another's statement than to condemn it. But if he cannot do so, let him ask how the other person understands it."
Who do you think said that? It sounds like me doesn't it? Did I say it? Would you listen to me if I said it? Did Gandhi say it? Would you listen to him? It's actually a quote from St. Ignatius of Loyola. Will you listen to him? I found it in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under, "Offenses Against the Truth".
Here's another one,
ReplyDelete"They love you when you're on all the covers, when you're not and they love another. . ."
That's some good wisdom there. I think Jesus might have said that after the events following Palm Sunday.