Lady Looks Like a Dude, by Ember

So, I was looking up this passage on what are commonly referred to as male or female traits. Many people seem to have prejudice according to the way they are, or prefer to operate, and want to say that either the male, or the female traits are not as good as the other, rather than to say they are both good and necessary and create a harmonious balance together as is symbolized by the Taoist taijitu, yin/yang.  

Fourth, traditional ethics overrates culturally masculine traits like “independence, autonomy, intellect, will, wariness, hierarchy, domination, culture, transcendence, product, asceticism, war, and death,” while it underrates culturally feminine traits like “interdependence, community, connection, sharing, emotion, body, trust, absence of hierarchy, nature, immanence, process, joy, peace, and life.” Fifth, and finally, it favors “male” ways of moral reasoning that emphasize rules, rights, universality, and impartiality over “female” ways of moral reasoning that emphasize relationships, responsibilities, particularity, and partiality (Jaggar, “Feminist Ethics,” 1992). - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/ 12/30/11

If you look at all the male vs. female traits it seems that Jesus emphasized the feminine traits in his life and teachings. He, "whom God made our wisdom" (1 Cor 1:30) Wasn't he being the perfect example of the "good shepherd"? I can't imagine Jesus treating people the way that the shepherds of the Church, as a whole, treat their flock (there are good examples like St. Francis of Assisi. And remember many of the first apostles gave up their lives for their faith). But, as a whole, what wisdom are they following in doing what they do, this hierarchy? Would Jesus advocate burning at the stake?  Would a woman?  Would a mother? It seems to be very masculine based traits that are employed above the feminine. Why? By whose example? I just said the example of Jesus was to employ the feminine traits. The world was already filled with the masculine to the point of imbalance. Why go the way of dominance? The impartiality in setting down rules and regulations; "They bind heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with their finger." (Mt 23:4), above personal responsibility. This seems to be the way of man and the wisdom of man, not of God.  

What kind of "bride" is the Church preparing for Christ, the bridegroom? They themselves say that the Church is the bride. Yet they are making her out to be some sort of feminist gone wrong, if she is a woman. Or, what? Are we to think that the bride of Christ is male? If she is a woman they are making her abandon her femininity in favor of masculinity, which is feminism gone wrong, or "she" is really a "he" and that makes Christ a homosexual if he were to marry him. Which the church obviously says is wrong! If you think feminism is so wrong, if you think homosexuality is so wrong, then why are you making the Church out to be that kind of relationship? Hypocrites! Lady looks like a dude! There is no balance in the Church right now that is the problem. Femininity has not been respected even though Christ himself showed us this was the way to perfection; balance. God created them male and female. You are imbalanced if you deny one side (rib, in Heb tsela) in either the microcosm (individual person) or the macrocosm (relationships). Christ was physically male (the Word) to the world, but he balanced his personal spiritual masculinity (word) and femininity (wisdom)  and gave us the example of what the world could be in balance; Love. Word and Wisdom united as "one flesh", heiros gamos, the holy marriage, i.e., the image of God.